| 2015 MiSAIL Lidar DEM: Emmet County (MI) | identificationInfo|
|---|---|
| (MI_Metadata) fileIdentifier: gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:52308 language: LanguageCode: eng characterSet: (MD_CharacterSetCode) UTF8 hierarchyLevel: (MD_ScopeCode) dataset hierarchyLevelName: Elevation contact: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: OCM Partners contactInfo: (CI_Contact) phone: (CI_Telephone) voice: (missing) address: (CI_Address) role: (CI_RoleCode) resourceProvider contact: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: NOAA Office for Coastal Management contactInfo: (CI_Contact) phone: (CI_Telephone) voice: (843) 740-1202 address: (CI_Address) deliveryPoint: 2234 South Hobson Ave city: Charleston administrativeArea: SC postalCode: 29405-2413 country: (missing) electronicMailAddress: coastal.info@noaa.gov onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website description: NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) information role: (CI_RoleCode) pointOfContact dateStamp: DateTime: 2023-07-03T12:21:50 metadataStandardName: ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata Part 2 Extensions for imagery and gridded data metadataStandardVersion: ISO 19115-2:2009(E) return to top identificationInfo: (MD_DataIdentification) citation: (CI_Citation) title: 2015 MiSAIL Lidar DEM: Emmet County (MI) alternateTitle: mi2105_emmet_dem_m8513_metadata date: (CI_Date) date: 2015 dateType: (CI_DateTypeCode) publication identifier: (MD_Identifier) authority: (CI_Citation) title: NOAA/NMFS/EDM date: (inapplicable) code: Anchor: InPort Catalog ID 52308 citedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: (inapplicable) contactInfo: (CI_Contact) onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/52308 protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: Full Metadata Record description: View the complete metadata record on InPort for more information about this dataset. function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) information role: (inapplicable) citedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: (inapplicable) contactInfo: (CI_Contact) onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov/ protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) website description: Information on the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) download role: (inapplicable) citedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: (inapplicable) contactInfo: (CI_Contact) onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=8512 protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: Citation URL description: Link to custom download the lidar point data from which these raster Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data were created. function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) download role: (inapplicable) citedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: (inapplicable) contactInfo: (CI_Contact) onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid12b/8512/supplemental/mi2015_emmet_m8512_lidar_report.pdf protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: Dataset report description: Link to data set report. function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) download role: (inapplicable) citedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: (inapplicable) contactInfo: (CI_Contact) onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/ protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: NOAA's Office for Coastal Management (OCM) Data Access Viewer (DAV) description: The Data Access Viewer (DAV) allows a user to search for and download elevation, imagery, and land cover data for the coastal U.S. and its territories. The data, hosted by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management, can be customized and requested for free download through a checkout interface. An email provides a link to the customized data, while the original data set is available through a link within the viewer. function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) download role: (inapplicable) presentationForm: (unknown) abstract: This metadata record describes the hydro-flattened bare earth digital elevation model (DEM) derived from the classified LiDAR data for the 2015 Michigan LiDAR project covering approximately 494 square miles, in which its extents cover Emmet County. The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) downloaded the MI_13Co-Emmett_2015 Digital Elevation Model (DEM) files from this USGS site: ftp://rockyftp.cr.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/OPR/ and processed the data to the Data Access Viewer (DAV) and https. In addition to these bare earth Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data, the lidar point data that these DEMs were created from, are also available. These data are available for custom download at the link provided in the URL section of this metadata record. purpose: To acquire detailed surface elevation data for use in conservation planning, design, research, floodplain mapping, dam safety assessments, and hydrologic modeling. LAS and bare earth DEM data products are suitable for 1 foot contour generation. USGS LiDAR Base Specification 1.0, QL2. 24.5 cm FVA. credit: State of Michigan (SOM) status: (MD_ProgressCode) completed pointOfContact: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: NOAA Office for Coastal Management contactInfo: (CI_Contact) phone: (CI_Telephone) voice: (843) 740-1202 address: (CI_Address) deliveryPoint: 2234 South Hobson Ave city: Charleston administrativeArea: SC postalCode: 29405-2413 country: (missing) electronicMailAddress: coastal.info@noaa.gov onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website description: NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) information role: (CI_RoleCode) pointOfContact pointOfContact: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: NOAA Office for Coastal Management contactInfo: (CI_Contact) phone: (CI_Telephone) voice: (843) 740-1202 address: (CI_Address) deliveryPoint: 2234 South Hobson Ave city: Charleston administrativeArea: SC postalCode: 29405-2413 country: (missing) electronicMailAddress: coastal.info@noaa.gov onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website description: NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) information role: (CI_RoleCode) custodian resourceMaintenance: (MD_MaintenanceInformation) maintenanceAndUpdateFrequency: (MD_MaintenanceFrequencyCode) unknown graphicOverview: (MD_BrowseGraphic) fileName: https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid12b/8512/supplemental/mi2015_emmet_m8512.kmz fileDescription: This graphic displays the footprint for this lidar data set. fileType: KML descriptiveKeywords: (MD_Keywords) keyword: EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION keyword: EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > COASTAL PROCESSES > COASTAL ELEVATION type: (MD_KeywordTypeCode) theme thesaurusName: (CI_Citation) title: Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords date: (missing) edition: 12.3 descriptiveKeywords: (MD_Keywords) keyword: CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MICHIGAN keyword: VERTICAL LOCATION > LAND SURFACE type: (MD_KeywordTypeCode) place thesaurusName: (CI_Citation) title: Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords date: (missing) edition: 12.3 descriptiveKeywords: (MD_Keywords) keyword: LIDAR > Light Detection and Ranging type: (MD_KeywordTypeCode) instrument thesaurusName: (CI_Citation) title: Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Instrument Keywords date: (missing) edition: 14.9 descriptiveKeywords: (MD_Keywords) keyword: Airplane > Airplane type: (MD_KeywordTypeCode) platform thesaurusName: (CI_Citation) title: Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Platform Keywords date: (missing) edition: 14.9 descriptiveKeywords: (MD_Keywords) keyword: ALS80 keyword: Bare Earth keyword: DEM keyword: Grid keyword: IMG keyword: beach keyword: erosion keyword: mapping type: (MD_KeywordTypeCode) theme descriptiveKeywords: (MD_Keywords) keyword: DEMs - partner (no harvest) type: (MD_KeywordTypeCode) project thesaurusName: (CI_Citation) title: InPort date: (inapplicable) resourceConstraints: (MD_LegalConstraints) useConstraints: (MD_RestrictionCode) otherRestrictions otherConstraints: Cite As: OCM Partners, [Date of Access]: 2015 MiSAIL Lidar DEM: Emmet County (MI) [Data Date Range], https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/52308. resourceConstraints: (MD_Constraints) useLimitation: NOAA provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incomplete, incorrect, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of the data. It is the responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data is suitable for the intended purpose. resourceConstraints: (MD_LegalConstraints) accessConstraints: (MD_RestrictionCode) otherRestrictions useConstraints: (MD_RestrictionCode) otherRestrictions otherConstraints: Access Constraints: None | Use Constraints: Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was collected and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use this data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. | Distribution Liability: The State of Michigan Geographic Information Systems digital data have been tested and their documentation carefully reviewed. However, the State of Michigan and its representatives make no warranty or representation, either expressed or implied, with respect to the digital data and their documentation, their quality, performance, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose. The digital data are distributed on "as is" basis, and the user assumes all risk to their quality, the results obtained from their use, and the performance of the data. In no event will the State of Michigan or its representatives be liable for any direct, indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages resulting from and defect in the State of Michigan or in their documentation. This disclaimer of warranty is exclusive and in lieu of all others, oral or written, express or implied. No agent or employee is authorized to make any modification, extension, or addition to this warranty. Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of the State of Michigan, NOAA, the Office for Coastal Management or its partners resourceConstraints: (MD_SecurityConstraints) classification: (MD_ClassificationCode) unclassified classificationSystem: (missing) handlingDescription: (missing) aggregationInfo: (MD_AggregateInformation) aggregateDataSetName: (CI_Citation) title: NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP) date: (unknown) identifier: (MD_Identifier) authority: (CI_Citation) title: NOAA/NMFS/EDM date: (inapplicable) code: 52308 citedResponsibleParty: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: (inapplicable) contactInfo: (CI_Contact) onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inportserve/waf/noaa/nos/ocmp/dmp/pdf/52308.pdf protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP) description: NOAA Data Management Plan for this record on InPort. function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) information role: (inapplicable) associationType: (DS_AssociationTypeCode) crossReference language: eng; US topicCategory: (MD_TopicCategoryCode) elevation environmentDescription: Microsoft Windows 7; ESRI ArcCatalog 9.3.1.1850 extent: (EX_Extent) geographicElement: (EX_GeographicBoundingBox) westBoundLongitude: -85.120864 eastBoundLongitude: -84.729138 southBoundLatitude: 45.269605 northBoundLatitude: 45.789573 temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent) extent: TimePeriod: description: | Currentness: Ground Condition beginPosition: 2015-05-01 endPosition: 2015-05-05 supplementalInformation: The following are the USGS lidar fields in JSON: { "ldrinfo" : { "ldrspec" : "USGS Base Specification 1.0, QL2 meeting 24.5cm FVA", "ldrsens" : "Leica ALS80", "ldrmaxnr" : "4", "ldrnps" : "0.65", "ldrdens" : "1.67", "ldradens" : "2.2", "ldranps" : "0.71", "ldrfltht" : "2250", "ldrfltsp" : "135", "ldrscana" : "32", "ldrscanr" : "64", "ldrpulsr" : "167", "ldrpulsd" : "10", "ldrpulsw" : "3", "ldrwavel" : "1064", "ldrmpia" : "1", "ldrbmdiv" : "0.3", "ldrswatw" : "1222", "ldrswato" : "30", "ldrcrs" : "NAD_1983_2011_State_Plane_Michigan_Central_FIPS_2112_Ft_Intl", "ldrgeoid" : "NGS Geoid12a" }, "ldraccur" : { "ldrchacc" : "1.0", "rawfva" : "0.080", "clsfva" : "0.080", "clscva" : "0.139", "clssvas" : { "svalctyp" : "LowVeg", "svavalue" : "0.133" }, "clssvas" : { "svalctyp" : "MedVeg", "svavalue" : "0.143" }, "clssvas" : { "svalctyp" : "HighVeg", "svavalue" : "0.179" } }, "lasinfo" : { "lasver" : "1.2", "lasprf" : "1", "laswheld" : "Withheld (ignore) points were identified in these files using class 10.", "lasolap" : "Swath "overage" points were identified in these files by classifying to class 11.", "lasintr" : "10", "lasclass" : { "clascode" : "1", "clasitem" : "Unclassified" }, "lasclass" : { "clascode" : "2", "clasitem" : "Bare-earth" }, "lasclass" : { "clascode" : "7", "clasitem" : "All noise" }, "lasclass" : { "clascode" : "9", "clasitem" : "Water" }, "lasclass" : { "clascode" : "10", "clasitem" : "Ignored Ground (Breakline Proximity)" }, "lasclass" : { "clascode" : "11", "clasitem" : "Withheld (overlap)" } }} return to top contentInfo: (MD_FeatureCatalogueDescription) complianceCode: false language: LanguageCode: eng includedWithDataset: false featureCatalogueCitation: (CI_Citation) title: USGS Base Specification 1.0, QL2 meeting 24.5cm FVA date: (unavailable) return to top distributionInfo: (MD_Distribution) distributionFormat: (MD_Format) name: Zip version: (missing) distributionFormat: (MD_Format) name: TIFF version: (missing) distributor: (MD_Distributor) distributorContact: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: NOAA Office for Coastal Management contactInfo: (CI_Contact) phone: (CI_Telephone) voice: (843) 740-1202 address: (CI_Address) deliveryPoint: 2234 South Hobson Ave city: Charleston administrativeArea: SC postalCode: 29405-2413 country: (missing) electronicMailAddress: coastal.info@noaa.gov onlineResource: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website description: NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) information role: (CI_RoleCode) distributor transferOptions: (MD_DigitalTransferOptions) onLine: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=8513 protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: Customized Download description: Create custom data files by choosing data area. function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) download transferOptions: (MD_DigitalTransferOptions) onLine: (CI_OnlineResource) linkage: https://coast.noaa.gov/htdata/raster2/elevation/MI_Emmet_DEM_2015_8513 protocol: WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link name: Bulk Download description: Bulk download of data files. function: (CI_OnLineFunctionCode) download return to top dataQualityInfo: (DQ_DataQuality) scope: (DQ_Scope) level: (MD_ScopeCode) dataset report: (DQ_AbsoluteExternalPositionalAccuracy) nameOfMeasure: Horizontal Positional Accuracy evaluationMethodDescription: Horizontal positional accuracy for Emmet LiDAR is dependent upon the quality of the GPS/INS solution, sensor calibration and ground conditions at the time of data capture. The standard system results for horizontal accuracy meet or exceed the project specified 1.0 meter RMSE. This value is computed by comparing ground control to a DEM derived from the classified LiDAR data and represents the RMSE of residuals on controls within the project area. result: (missing) report: (DQ_AbsoluteExternalPositionalAccuracy) nameOfMeasure: Vertical Positional Accuracy evaluationMethodDescription: For the DEM data derived from the classified point cloud, the FVA, SVA, and CVA were computed. The vertical accuracy was tested with independent survey check points located in various terrain types within Emmet County. These check points were not used in the calibration or post processing of the lidar point cloud data. The survey check points were distributed throughout the block area. Specifications for this project require that the FVA be 24.5 cm or better @ 95 percent confidence level. The RMSE values are as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA); assessed and reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/ASRPS Guidelines. FVA 0.041m RMSE, or 0.080FVA @ 95 percent confidence level in open terrain using RMSEz x 1.9600 The FVA was tested using 20 independent survey check points located in flat terrain types within Area 3. The survey checkpoints were distributed throughout the block area. The 20 independent check points were surveyed using static GPS base stations collecting point location for 20 minute intervals. Elevations were measured for the x,y,z location of each check point. Elevations interpolated from the DEM surface were then compared to the elevation values of the surveyed control. CVA 0.076m RMSE, or 0.139m CVA @ 95th Percentile using all FVA and SVA class checkpoints (CVA) The CVA was tested using 81 independent survey check points located in various terrain types within Area 3. The survey checkpoints were distributed throughout the block area. The 81 independent check points contained all FVA and SVA class points and were surveyed using static GPS base stations collecting point location for 20 minute intervals. Elevations were measured for the x,y,z location of each check point. Elevations interpolated from the DEM surface were then compared to the elevation values of the surveyed control. SVA 0.077m RMSE, or 0.133m SVA @ 95th Percentile The SVA was tested using 20 independent survey check points located in low vegetation terrain types within Area 3. The survey checkpoints were distributed throughout the block area. The 20 independent check points were surveyed using static GPS base stations collecting point location for 20 minute intervals. Elevations were measured for the x,y,z location of each check point. Elevations interpolated from the DEM surface were then compared to the elevation values of the surveyed control. 0.093m RMSE, or 0.143m SVA @ 95th Percentile The SVA was tested using 20 independent survey check points located in medium vegetation terrain types within Area 3. The survey checkpoints were distributed throughout the block area. The 20 independent check points were surveyed using static GPS base stations collecting point location for 20 minute intervals. Elevations were measured for the x,y,z location of each check point. Elevations interpolated from the DEM surface were then compared to the elevation values of the surveyed control. 0.083m RMSE, or 0.179m SVA @ 95th Percentile The SVA was tested using 21 independent survey check points located in high vegetation terrain types within Area 3. The survey checkpoints were distributed throughout the block area. The 21 independent check points were surveyed using static GPS base stations collecting point location for 20 minute intervals. Elevations were measured for the x,y,z location of each check point. Elevations interpolated from the DEM surface were then compared to the elevation values of the surveyed control. result: (missing) report: (DQ_CompletenessCommission) nameOfMeasure: Completeness Report evaluationMethodDescription: LiDAR data is collected for the project area. Post processing of the simultaneously acquired GPS/INS is performed and applied to the laser returns to output a point cloud in the specified project coordinate system and datums. The point cloud data is then subjected to automated classification routines to assign all points in the point cloud to ground, water, overlap and unclassified point classes. Anomalous laser returns that occur infrequently are removed entirely from the data set. Once clean bare earth points are established, DEMs are created using bare earth points and hydro features. The DEM surface is then compared to the survey checkpoints. These accuracies must pass the Fundamental Vertical Accuracy, Supplemental Vertical Accuracy, and Consolidated Vertical Accuracy specifications. result: (missing) report: (DQ_ConceptualConsistency) nameOfMeasure: Conceptual Consistency evaluationMethodDescription: LiDAR data is collected within the project area and processed. After the DEMs were created, the dataset was verified against control. Control was collected in 5 areas. Area 3 includes Emmet and Mackinac. Accuracy results are reported for area 3. result: (missing) lineage: (LI_Lineage) statement: (missing) processStep: (LI_ProcessStep) description: At selected locations throughout the site, accurate GPS coordinates and elevations are surveyed and the points are marked with targets. dateTime: DateTime: 2015-01-01T00:00:00 processStep: (LI_ProcessStep) description: New LiDAR data is captured for the project area using a Leica ALS80 w/MPiA LiDAR instrument an integrated IPAS20 GPS/INS system mounted within a Aero Commander twin engine airplane. dateTime: DateTime: 2015-01-01T00:00:00 processStep: (LI_ProcessStep) description: The airborne GPS data is post-processed in Intertial Explorer software and LEICA CloudPro software to determine the LiDAR sensor's angle and orientation in the terrain (project) coordinate system and datums during the survey. dateTime: DateTime: 2015-01-01T00:00:00 processStep: (LI_ProcessStep) description: The post processed GPS/INS solution is applied to the raw lidar data to orient and project the data points into the project area reference system as an unclassified point cloud. dateTime: DateTime: 2015-01-01T00:00:00 processStep: (LI_ProcessStep) description: The georeferenced lidar data is then classified and edited in Terrasolid Terrascan software. Data is classified to produce: Class 1: unclassified, Class 2: ground, Class 7: low point, Class 9: water, Class 10: ignored ground, Class 11: withheld. dateTime: DateTime: 2015-01-01T00:00:00 processStep: (LI_ProcessStep) description: The bare earth points of the processed lidar data are then output to a DEM tile format. The DEM is compared to the ground control and elevation differences between the surface and surveyed elevation are recorded in tabular form. Vertical accuracy statistics are then developed to produce vertical RMSE and overall accuracy estimates and reports. dateTime: DateTime: 2015-01-01T00:00:00 processStep: (LI_ProcessStep) description: The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) downloaded the MI_13Co-Emmett_2015 Digital Elevation Model (DEM) files from this USGS site: ftp://rockyftp.cr.usgs.gov/vdelivery/Datasets/Staged/Elevation/OPR/ The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) downloaded 2345 raster files from the USGS rockyftp site. The data were in MI State Plane South coordinates and NAVD88 (Geoid12A) elevations in feet. The bare earth raster files were at a 2 ft grid spacing. OCM performed the following processing on the data for Digital Coast storage and provisioning purposes: 1. Converted the raster files from img format to cloud optimized geotiffs dateTime: DateTime: 2023-07-03T00:00:00 processor: (CI_ResponsibleParty) organisationName: Office for Coastal Management role: (CI_RoleCode) processor source: (LI_Source) description: Source Contribution: The classified lidar point cloud is used to derive various data products such as, but not limited to, bare earth gridded DEM, triangulated irregular networks (TIN), contours, digital surface models (DSM). The output format is fully compliant LAS v1.2 or v1.3, Point Record Format 1 scaleDenominator: (MD_RepresentativeFraction) denominator: 1200 sourceCitation: (CI_Citation) title: Classified lidar date: (missing) sourceExtent: (EX_Extent) temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent) extent: TimeInstant: timePosition: 2015 source: (LI_Source) description: Source Contribution: Targeted ground control is used to create a digital control file and control report as well as QC check of LiDAR accuracy. Predefined points (NGS when available) within the project area are targeted. sourceCitation: (CI_Citation) title: Ground control date: (CI_Date) date: 2010-01-01 dateType: (CI_DateTypeCode) publication sourceExtent: (EX_Extent) temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent) extent: TimeInstant: timePosition: 2015 source: (LI_Source) description: Source Contribution: Aerial LiDAR and GPS/IMU data are recorded for the defined project area at an altitude, flight speed, scanner swath width and scanner pulse frequency to achieve the design goals of the project. sourceCitation: (CI_Citation) title: LiDAR Data date: (missing) sourceExtent: (EX_Extent) temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent) extent: TimeInstant: timePosition: 2015 source: (LI_Source) sourceCitation: (CI_Citation) title: Originator date: (missing) source: (LI_Source) description: Source Contribution: Post processed GPS/INS is applied to the lidar point data to georeference each point in the project coordinate system scaleDenominator: (MD_RepresentativeFraction) denominator: 1200 sourceCitation: (CI_Citation) title: Post processed GPS/INS date: (missing) sourceExtent: (EX_Extent) temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent) extent: TimeInstant: timePosition: 2015 source: (LI_Source) description: Source Contribution: The post processed lidar data has been projected and oriented in the specified coordinate system as an un-classified point cloud. scaleDenominator: (MD_RepresentativeFraction) denominator: 1200 sourceCitation: (CI_Citation) title: Post processed lidar date: (missing) sourceExtent: (EX_Extent) temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent) extent: TimeInstant: timePosition: 2015 source: (LI_Source) description: Source Contribution: The tile definition defines discreet non-overlapping rectangular areas used as cut lines to break up the large classified lidar dataset into smaller, more manageable data tiles. Each tile is 2500ft by 2500ft in dimension. scaleDenominator: (MD_RepresentativeFraction) denominator: 1200 sourceCitation: (CI_Citation) title: Tile Definition date: (missing) sourceExtent: (EX_Extent) temporalElement: (EX_TemporalExtent) extent: TimeInstant: timePosition: 2015 | |