gov.noaa.nmfs.inport:49438 eng UTF8 dataset OCM Partners resourceProvider NOAA Office for Coastal Management (843) 740-1202 2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston SC 29405-2413 coastal.info@noaa.gov https://coast.noaa.gov WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page information pointOfContact 2024-02-29T00:00:00 ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata Part 2 Extensions for imagery and gridded data ISO 19115-2:2009(E) 2015 USGS Lidar DEM: 3DEP Co-Op South Central MS ms2015_usgs_3dep_coop_dem_m6307_metadata 2017-07-13 publication NOAA/NMFS/EDM 49438 https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/49438 WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Full Metadata Record View the complete metadata record on InPort for more information about this dataset. information https://coast.noaa.gov WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Citation URL Online Resource download https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Citation URL Online Resource download https://coast.noaa.gov/dataregistry WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Citation URL Online Resource download Mississippi Coastal QL2 Lidar with 3DEP Extension Lidar 0.7m NPS Lidar Data Acquisition and Processing Production Task USGS Contract No. G10PC00057 Task Order No. G15PD00091 Woolpert Order No. 75157 CONTRACTOR: Woolpert, Inc. This metadata record describes the 1m bare earth Digital Elevation Models (DEMs)for the following counties in Mississippi: Copiah, Lawrence, Lincoln, Pike, and Simpson. This task is for a high resolution data set of lidar covering approximately 5981 square miles. The lidar data was acquired and processed in compliance to U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program Lidar Base Specification version 1.2. The lidar data was acquired and processed under the requirements identified in this task order. Lidar data is a remotely sensed high resolution elevation data collected by an airborne platform. The lidar sensor uses a combination of laser range finding, GPS positioning, and inertial measurement technologies. The lidar systems collect data point clouds that are used to produce highly detailed Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) of the earth's terrain, man-made structures, and vegetation. The task required the LiDAR data to be collected at a nominal pulse spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters. The final products include classified LAS, one (1) meter pixel raster DEMs of the bare-earth surface in ERDAS IMG Format, and 8-bit intensity images. Gridded products conform to a 1500 m x 1500 m tiling scheme. Each LAS file contains lidar point information, which has been calibrated, controlled, and classified. Additional deliverables include hydrologic breakline data, control data, flight line vectors and tile index provided as ESRI shapefile, lidar processing and survey reports in PDF format, FGDC metadata files for each data deliverable in .xml format, and LAS swath data. Ground conditions: Water at normal levels; no unusual inundation; no snow; leaf off. In addition to the bare earth DEMs, the topobathy lidar point data are also available. These data are available for custom download here: https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=6306 Breaklines created from the lidar area also available for download in both gdb and gpkg format at: https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid12b/6306/breaklines. The DEM and breakline products have not been reviewed by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) and any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of NOAA, OCM or its partners. Original contact information: Contact Org: Woolpert Phone: (937) 461-5660 The purpose of this project is for lidar mapping services in support of the USGS for task name Mississippi Coastal QL2 Lidar with 3DEP Extension Lidar Task Order Acknowledgement of the U.S. Geological Survey would be appreciated for products derived from these data. completed NOAA Office for Coastal Management (843) 740-1202 2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston SC 29405-2413 coastal.info@noaa.gov https://coast.noaa.gov WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page information pointOfContact NOAA Office for Coastal Management (843) 740-1202 2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston SC 29405-2413 coastal.info@noaa.gov https://coast.noaa.gov WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page information custodian asNeeded https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid12b/6306/supplemental/ms2015_usgs_3dep_coop_m6306.kmz This graphic shows the lidar footprint for the 2015 USGS 3DEP Co-Op MS project. kmz EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > TOPOGRAPHY > TERRAIN ELEVATION > TOPOGRAPHICAL RELIEF MAPS EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS > COASTAL PROCESSES > COASTAL ELEVATION theme Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Science Keywords 17.0 CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MISSISSIPPI place Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Location Keywords 20.8 DEM IMG theme DEMs - partner (no harvest) project InPort otherRestrictions Cite As: OCM Partners, [Date of Access]: 2015 USGS Lidar DEM: 3DEP Co-Op South Central MS [Data Date Range], https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/49438. NOAA provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incomplete, incorrect, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of the data. It is the responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data is suitable for the intended purpose. otherRestrictions Access Constraints: No restrictions apply to this data. otherRestrictions Use Constraints: None. However, users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this dataset was collected and that some parts of these data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use these data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. Acknowledgement of the U.S. Geological Survey would be appreciated for products derived from these data. otherRestrictions Distribution Liability: Woolpert prepared the original data as set forth in the Scope of Services, in accordance with reasonable care and due diligence as set forth in this Agreement, however, due to the easily alterable nature of electronic media, files, documents, and other deliverables, Woolpert, Inc. makes no warranties, either expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, merchantability, or fitness for any particular purpose, including, but not limited to, use of any/all data as described within this metadata file, by any user of this data. Any use will be at the end-user's sole risk. Any conclusions drawn from the analysis of this information are not the responsibility of Woolpert, Inc., the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the MS Dept of Environmental Quality, NOAA, the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) or its partners. unclassified NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP) NOAA/NMFS/EDM 49438 https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inportserve/waf/noaa/nos/ocmp/dmp/pdf/49438.pdf WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link NOAA Data Management Plan (DMP) NOAA Data Management Plan for this record on InPort. information crossReference grid eng; US elevation Microsoft Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7600); ArcMap 10.2; ArcCatalog 10.2; TerraScan ver. 15.01; TerraModeler ver. 15.01; Geocue 2014.1.21; LP360 2014.1. Approximate size of entire delivery dataset = 3.0TB -90.738533 -89.65204 30.999053 32.050978 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-01-28 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-01-29 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-01-30 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-01-31 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-02-27 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-02-28 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-03-05 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-03-06 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-03-07 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-03-15 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-03-16 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-03-17 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-03-18 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-03-22 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-03-23 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-03-24 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-03-26 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-03-27 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-03-28 | Currentness: Ground Condition 2015-04-01 The Mississippi Coastal QL2 Lidar with 3DEP Extension Lidar Report, may be accessed here: https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid12b/6306/supplemental/ms2015_usgs_3dep_coop_m6306_lidar_report.pdf The Mississippi Coastal QL2 Lidar with 3DEP Extension Ground Control Survey Report, may be accessed here: https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.amazonaws.com/laz/geoid12b/6306/supplemental/ms2015_usgs_3dep_coop_m6306_survey_report.pdf NOAA Office for Coastal Management (843) 740-1202 2234 South Hobson Ave Charleston SC 29405-2413 coastal.info@noaa.gov https://coast.noaa.gov WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link NOAA Office for Coastal Management Website NOAA Office for Coastal Management Home Page information distributor https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/lidar/search/where:ID=6307 WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Customized Download Create custom data files by choosing data area, product type, map projection, file format, datum, etc. download https://noaa-nos-coastal-lidar-pds.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/dem/MS_3DEP_COOP_DEM_2015_6307/index.html WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link Bulk Download Simple download of data files. download dataset Horizontal Positional Accuracy Compiled to meet 0.36 meters horizontal accuracy at 95 percent confidence level.; Quantitative Value: 0.36 meters, Test that produced the value: Lidar system specifications are available in the project report Vertical Positional Accuracy LAS data covering the Mississippi Coastal QL2 Lidar with 3DEP Extension Lidar Task Order was compared to independent survey control points to determine the NVA of the LAS Swath and of the Bare-Earth DEM. In addition, this LAS data was compared to independent VVA points. Raw LAS Swath Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (NVA) Tested 0.176 meters non-vegetated vertical accuracy at a 95 percent confidence level, derived according to NSSDA, in open terrain using 0.090 meters (RMSEz) x 1.96000 as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA); assessed and reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/ASPRS Guidelines. Bare-Earth DEM Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (NVA) Tested 0.164 meters non-vegetated vertical accuracy at a 95 percent confidence level, derived according to NSSDA, in open terrain using 0.084 meters (RMSEz) x 1.96000 as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA); assessed and reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/ASPRS Guidelines.; Quantitative Value: 0.176 meters, Test that produced the value: Raw Swath Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (NVA) Tested 0.176 meters non-vegetated vertical accuracy at a 95 percent confidence level, derived according to NSSDA, in open terrain using (RMSEz) x 1.96000 as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA); assessed and reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/ASPRS Guidelines and tested against the TIN using all points.; Quantitative Value: 0.164 meters, Test that produced the value: Bare-Earth DEM Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (NVA) Tested 0.164 meters non-vegetated vertical accuracy at a 95 percent confidence level, derived according to NSSDA, in open terrain using (RMSEz) x 1.96000 as defined by the National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA); assessed and reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/ASPRS Guidelines and tested against the DEM.; Quantitative Value: 0.239 meters, Test that produced the value: Vegetated Vertical Accuracy (VVA) Tested 0.239 meters at the 95th percentile reported using National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP)/ASPRS Guidelines and tested against the DEM. VVA Errors larger than 95th percentile include: Point 3017, Easting 814793.008, Northing 3535747.708, Z-Error 0.308 meters Point 3031, Easting 725518.905, Northing 3472151.735, Z-Error 0.296 meters Point 3041, Easting 780357.999, Northing 3545844.660, Z-Error 0.241 meters Completeness Report The lidar data is visually inspected for completeness to ensure that are no void areas or missing data. Conceptual Consistency All formatted data cover the entire area specified for this project and are validated using a combination of commercial lidar processing software, GIS software, and proprietary programs to ensure proper formatting and loading prior to delivery. Lidar Acquisition Using two Leica ALS70 (lidar) systems on board a Woolpert aircraft, high density data, at a nominal pulse spacing (NPS) of 0.7 meters, were collected for this task order (approximately 5981 square miles). Leica Specs- AGL = 1,981 meters - Aircraft Speed = 150 Knots, Field of View (Full) = 40 degrees, Pulse Rate = 272 kHz, Scan Rate = 41.0 Hz, with an average side lap of 20%. Multiple returns were recorded for each laser pulse along with an intensity value for each return. Thirty-one (31) missions were flown between January 28, 2015 and April 01, 2015. Six (6) Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Base Stations were used in support of the lidar data acquisition. Specific information regarding latitude, longitude, and ellipsoid height to the L1 phase center is included in the lidar processing report. Data for the task order is referenced to the UTM Zone 15N, North American Datum of 1983 (2011), and NAVD88, in meters. The geoid used to reduce satellite derived elevations to orthometric heights was GEOID12B. Once the data acquisition and GPS processing phases are complete, the lidar data was processed immediately to verify the coverage had no voids. The GPS and IMU data was post processed using differential and Kalman filter algorithms to derive a best estimate of trajectory. The quality of the solution was verified to be consistent with the accuracy requirements of the project. The SBET was used to reduce the lidar slant range measurements to a raw reflective surface for each flight line. The coverage was classified to extract a bare earth digital elevation model (DEM) and separate last returns. The ALS70 calibration and system performance is verified on a periodic basis using Woolpert's calibration range. The calibration range consists of a large building and runway. The edges of the building and control points along the runway have been located using conventional survey methods. Inertial measurement unit (IMU) misalignment angles and horizontal accuracy are calculated by comparing the position of the building edges between opposing flight lines. The scanner scale factor and vertical accuracy is calculated through comparison of lidar data against control points along the runway. Field calibration is performed on all flight lines to refine the IMU misalignment angles. IMU misalignment angles are calculated from the relative displacement of features within the overlap region of adjacent (and opposing) flight lines. The raw lidar data is reduced using the refined misalignment angles 2015-01-28T00:00:00 Lidar ground control and QAQC control Acquisition The field crew utilized Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) GPS surveying throughout most of the ground control data collection process. Using RTK GPS techniques, observations were performed on a total of 89 LiDAR control points and 470 ground control quality check points. The survey was conducted using a 1-second epoch rate, in a fixed solution RTK mode, with each observation lasting between 60 to 180 seconds. Each station was occupied twice to insure the necessary horizontal and vertical accuracies were being met for this photogrammetric project. 2015-02-17T00:00:00 Lidar Deliverable Processing The individual flight lines were inspected to ensure the systematic and residual errors have been identified and removed. Then, the flight lines were compared to adjacent flight lines for any mismatches to obtain a homogeneous coverage throughout the project area. The point cloud underwent a classification process to determine bare-earth points and non-ground points utilizing "first and only" as well as "last of many" lidar returns. This process determined Default (Class 1), Ground (Class 2), Low Noise (Class 7), Water (Class 9), Ignored Ground (Class 10), Bridge Decks (Class 17) and High Noise (Class 18). The bare-earth (Class 2 - Ground) lidar points underwent a manual QA/QC step to verify the quality of the DEM as well as a peer-based QC review. This included a review of the DEM surface to remove artifacts and ensure topographic quality. Classification of water (class 9) and ignored ground (class 10) was completed via the use of the hydrologic breaklines collected for the hydro-flattening phase. The overlap classes were determined by first identifying the overlapping areas and reclassifying the LAS data by offset from a corridor. This allows the returns located on the edge of the swath to be removed from the bare earth coverage in an effort to produce a more uniform data density. The returns determined to be overlap including overlap default, ground, water, and ignored ground are then applied an overlap flag and reclassified to their respective standard classification value. The surveyed ground control points are used to make vertical adjustments to the data set and to perform the accuracy checks and statistical analysis of the lidar dataset. Supervisory QC monitoring of work in progress and completed editing ensured consistency of classification character and adherence to project requirements across the entire project area. The resulting deliverables for this task order consist of classified LAS file in LAS 1.4 format, Raw Swath LAS files in LAS 1.4 format, 1 meter pixel size DEM files in ERDAS IMG format, 1 meter pixel size 8-bit Intensity files in GeoTIFF format, and Hydrologic Breakline data in ESRI shape file format. The method used to create the DEM consisted of isolating the ground (class 2) points and introducing 3-d breakline data derived from delineating hydrologic features and applying USGS v1.2 hydro flattening specification z-values. This combined dataset was then processed into a gridded format for additional QAQC to ensure DEM quality. Following QAQC process completion, a gridded raster file was created on a per tile basis. The task order projection information was applied to the final raster dataset. Prior to delivery, all raster files were visually reviewed to ensure coverage and reviewed using automated processes to ensure proper formatting. 2015-01-28T00:00:00 The NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) received the data in img format. The bare earth raster files were at a 1 m grid spacing. The data were in UTM Zone 15 and UTM Zone 16 coordinates and NAVD88 elevations in meters. OCM copied the raster files to database and https for Digital Coast storage and provisioning purposes. 2017-06-13T00:00:00 Source Contribution: This data set is the project specified acquired point cloud data. | Type of Source Media: Lidar dataset Lidar acquisition 2015-12-31 publication 2015-01-28 Source Contribution: This data set is the project specified lidar deliverables. | Type of Source Media: Lidar dataset Lidar deliverable processing 2015-12-31 publication 2015-01-28 Source Contribution: This data set is the project specified acquired ground control and QAQC control data. | Type of Source Media: Control dataset Survey Control Acquisition 2015-12-31 publication 2015-02-17